A couple of days ago I visited the Pencil Museum in Keswick in the UK's Lake District (pencils were invented in the Lake District in about 1550, using the graphite that could be readily found there). One interesting snippet of information was that back in the early days of the space race, the US spent millions of dollars designing a pen that would write in space. By contrast, the Russians simply issued their cosmonauts with a pencil.
A great story, and one in wide circulation, but unfortunately not true. In the beginning, both the US and Russian issued their astronauts with pencils. By 1967, a private company in the US had developed a pen that would write in space and convinced the US of the merits of using their pen, rather than the humble pencil (bits break off a pencil and float round in the air, and pencils can catch fire).
Why is the myth so sticky? To anybody familiar with Chip and Dan Heath’s book Made to Stick, the patterns are clear. It is a classic re-telling of the fable of the Hare and Tortoise, we would like it to be true because it shows the power of thrift over expenditure (not that the Russian space programme was exactly cheap).
Anybody who wants to read more can check out the story at Scientific American.
And the lessons for market researchers? 1) Don’t believe every good story somebody tells you. 2) We need to make our research stories more sticky.