Become a Fan

Other Pages

My Photo

Disclosure

  • Disclosure
    Nobody pays me to write any of the copy on my blog, and should I ever have the good fortune that they do, I will declare it. My main employment is as the owner and principal of The Future Place consultancy. The Future Place provides two key services 1) training and services to industry and academic bodies and 2) consultancy services to companies. The details of the companies I work with are a private matter, but if I blog about any company who has paid The Future Place more than expenses recently (approx. two years) I will mention that they are a client. I hold equity in Virtual Surveys and provide consulting services to them from time to time. I am paid to run courses for a number of trade bodies and over the last few years clients have included ESOMAR, AMSRS, MRS, and MRIA.

My daughters eShop

« The Phorm model may be sunk – I hope! | Main | Great analysis of Skoda's cake ad »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452ba9569e200e551d7e8f58833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Barbarians Are At The Gate!:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Simon

Ray, I completely agree with you. Less should be spent looking at data collection and more on data implementation.

Client researchers and marketers are happy using poorly conceived research and unrepresentative data so long as it says something they like. Moving forward, the research needs to become more of a steward or consultant - pulling apart and then re-forming all of the available data, using his or her experience to judge on what is reasonable to assume, and then making practical suggestions to implement the findings.

In my experience, the final step is the trickiest and the one that researchers currently shy away from. They may not know the client's company as well as the client, but they should know the industry they are working in.

So, from my perspective, I would like to see less talk on methodology and more on usage - normative benchmarking, practical implementation and the like.

Best
Simon

Tom

Yes, I agree - huge complacency about what "2.0" actually means for research beyond fancier panels. I remember having a conversation a couple of years ago being told "wow it's awesome, consumers now are so empowered and vocal", and asking "OK, why do they need researchers then?". The USP of research for business is that it provides consumer access; the reason to participate for consumers is that it gives them a voice. "Web 2.0" potentially wipes both of these out. Not to mention that old-school research is about 10000 times more boring for people to take part in than polls, panels, forums, surveymonkey style stuff.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

The Festival of NewMR?

The Main Stage of the NewMR Festival will be on November 3rd, the premier online event of the year. The call for synopses is now closed. We will be announcing news for balloting soon.
Visit the NewMR website to find out more.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Technorati